I use just one paid feature even after more than a half-year of purchasing, which is the Dehaze feature and which can be also worked on by careful tweaking of curves. Even as a casual home user I felt a bit of guilt about sticking to only the free version due to this.
Xvid4psp nvenc license#
The real benefit of Studio license is the FX not available in Free version, besides paying for the effort of improving and maintaining such complex software. The with and without GPU-Decode benchmark - I found useful for a reason - The Internet is littered with claims that buying Studio version will automagically solve all performance problems whenever somebody complains about slow rendering - obviously that's not true. Right - I had the APUs in my head since I previously ran that - only APUs have the decode support. h.264 is easy, try h.265 and fusion without GPU HW decode This is one of the gripes I have with Puget benchmark. GPU decoding is helpful in cases where the CPU decoding takes most of CPU time, preventing it too do other CPU-only tasks, like in Fusion tab. Yes, I suspect in case of GPU decode and effects/VFX, the GPU needs to transfer decoded data to the main memory for editing and effects/VFX operations, while if it's decoded by the CPU it goes directly to the main memory. Only Intel CPUs have h.264 decode, but it is not in effect if you disabled GPU HW decode in Resolve. So many "ases", don't know how I managed that Also note that actual playback in performance mode (default) can be as much as twice as fast as the final render. manually load each benchmark into resolve and render out, at the end of which you get the info about how many seconds it took to render. Obviously you didn't do what I proposed i.e. Why is it higher without GPU decode support? Does it free up GPU to work faster in FX and Fusion? Most CPUs have H.264 decode support anyways so the performance hit is not that great. I just retried the same benchmark without GPU decode support (unchecked) in preferences and the scores are a little higher for Fusion and VFX : That requires using a stopwatch because the final results do not list time taken per test. Each conversion took about 1 hour (give or take 10 to 15 minutes). Each of these used the H.265 (NVenc) encoder with all the other video options on their default settings. Perhaps has also something to do with VRAM allocated to the encoder (512 vs 1024). For each of these conversions, I used identical settings except I changed the Constant Quality option in HandBrake. I seems 7th gen NVENC is twice as fast as 5th gen.
Xvid4psp nvenc mp4#
Does anyone know the correct setting to get an mp4 compatible with both iphone and psp.Mario Kalogjera wrote:You take the length of the timeline in frames and subdivide with render time in seconds to get fractional fps that you can more precisely compare to Puget's. I was able to change most of the settings I recognized from the old version to the new one but for some reason my psp says its unsupported.
Xvid4psp nvenc windows 7#
Now, I've upgraded to windows 7 and found out that v5.037 dont work with W7 so I used xvid4psp v5.0.37.5 r25. Recently I have been able to create mp4s that are compatible with both PSP and iPhone using Xvid4psp v5.037 on Vista OS.
0 kommentar(er)
